Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sebastian Fanselow vs Marc Polmans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fanselow vs Polmans analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Fanselow vs Marc Polmans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fanselow 2 - 0 Polmans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fanselow has won 49.17% of points on their second serve, while Polmans has won 47.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fanselow, in recent form, has won 50.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Polmans has won 50.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.45% and 26.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fanselow has saved 59.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Polmans has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fanselow has won 59.52% of matches played (W/L 50/ 34), with Polmans winning 52.46% (W/L 32/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30). Polmans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 96/ 70), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 12/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22), where as Polmans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.27% of matches (W/L 23/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fanselow winning 2 times and Polmans being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Fanselow winning 4 and Polmans winning 1. The last match between Fanselow and Polmans was at the Burnie Challenger, 24-01-2019, Third, Hard with Sebastian Fanselow getting the victory 3-6 6-4 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fanselow and Polmans have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fanselow winning 1 times and Polmans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fanselow winning 1, and Polmans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fanselow has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.58 while Polmans has played against players with an average rank of 340.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fanselow has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Polmans has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fanselow has converted 35.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Polmans has converted 48.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
313
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
200
Rank
116
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
60% (355-233)
Career Total W/L
56% (324-256)
50% (18-18)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$3,105
Career Prize Money
$579,380
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sebastian Fanselow | Marc Polmans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 28 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:4 | 1:8:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (65/96) | 68% (63/92) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (48/65) | 68% (43/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (13/31) | 55% (16/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (33/92) | 36% (35/96) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Marc Polmans
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sebastian Fanselow | Marc Polmans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (18/18) | 41% (7/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (39/43) | 40% (17/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (394/413) | 47% (180/203) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 149 | 76 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 103 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:16 | 1:49:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.81 | 332.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1417/2442) | 66% (805/1217) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (993/1417) | 68% (550/805) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (504/1025) | 47% (195/412) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (88/249) | 48% (40/83) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (961/2526) | 36% (411/1146) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (11/13) | 50% (6/6) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 49% (17/35) | 44% (7/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (20/3) | 0% (8/0) |
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Lucas Gerch
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Luca Castagnola
43%
(
41 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Marc Polmans
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
10
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Marc Polmans
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Marc Polmans
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Marc Polmans
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
10
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
9
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
44%
(
33 of
75)
8
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Marc Polmans
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fanselow Vs Polmans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sebastian Fanselow
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
